[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110512.172905.2288301818993183911.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 17:29:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: sathya.perla@...lex.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] be2net: fix mbox polling for signal
reception
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:49:06 +0100
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:41 +0530, Sathya Perla wrote:
>> Sending mbox cmds require multiple steps of writing to the DB register and polling
>> for an ack. Gettting interrupted in the middle by a signal breaks the mbox protocol.
>> So, set the task to UNINTERRUPTIBLE for mbox polling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@...lex.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/benet/be_cmds.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/benet/be_cmds.c b/drivers/net/benet/be_cmds.c
>> index bff41ed..55c8301 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/benet/be_cmds.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/benet/be_cmds.c
>> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int be_mbox_db_ready_wait(struct be_adapter *adapter, void __iomem *db)
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>> + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>> schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(1));
>
> msleep(1) is a lot more readable.
Agreed.
Sathya, please make this change and resubmit this patch series.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists