netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/10] ipvs: Use IP_VS_RT_MODE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110512.182857.1123203303677885686.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2011 18:28:57 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ja@....bg
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] ipvs: Use IP_VS_RT_MODE_* instead of magic
 constants.

From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 02:32:09 +0300 (EEST)

> 	My simple tests do not show any problems with patches
> 4, 5 and the new 6 and 7. I tested TUN mode for rt_src/rt_dst
> and DR/NAT for rt_dst replacement, related ICMP is relayed properly.
> So, we should be ok but I'll do more tests in the following
> days because the list with possible combinations for testing
> is too long: different forwarding mode (DR/TUN/NAT),
> local or remote real server, local or remote client,
> In or Out related ICMP, Passive or Active FTP...

Julian, I integrated your work and pushed 3 patches to net-next-2.6

1) Original patch #4 with your followup integrated
2) Original patch #5
3) You're replacement for original patch #6 and #7

Let me know if there are any followup fixes that we need to work
on.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html