[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinO4Hity5++152Ff-RuACFDtoAV2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 07:59:45 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>
To: frank.blaschka@...ibm.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] [PATCH] qeth: convert to hw_features part 2
2011/5/12 <frank.blaschka@...ibm.com>:
> From: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@...ibm.com>
>
> Set rx csum default to hw checksumming again.
> Remove sysfs interface for rx csum (checksumming) and TSO (large_send).
> With the new hw_features it does not work to keep the old sysfs
> interface in parallel. Convert options.checksum_type to new hw_features.
[...]
> + /* hw may have changed during offline or recovery */
> + if (!qeth_is_supported(card, IPA_INBOUND_CHECKSUM)) {
[...]
This check should go to ndo_fix_features callback. If it fails then
just return features &~NETIF_F_RXCSUM from there ...
> +update_feature:
> + rtnl_lock();
> + card->dev->hw_features &= ~NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
> + card->dev->features &= ~NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
> + netdev_update_features(card->dev);
> + rtnl_unlock();
... and then this should be just:
rtnl_lock();
netdev_update_features(card->dev);
rtnl_unlock();
BTW, How is the recovery process protected from interface removal if
it's not run under rtnl_lock?
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists