netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 34322] New: No ECN marking in IPv6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1305259477.4065.405.camel@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2011 05:04:37 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@...foot.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 34322] New: No ECN marking in IPv6

On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 00:15 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:52:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >>> I cooked for you the official patch and made sure it worked with a RED
> >>> ECN setup, and one ipv6 tcp xmit.
> >> Great, thanks :-) This looks good to me.
> > Applied, thanks everyone.
> 
> Do you think it would be possible to get it backported to stable kernels?
> (I've been told getting it into the 2.6.32.x series is the easiest way to get
> it into Debian stable, and I guess it should be a candidate.)

If this doesn't apply directly to 2.6.32 then you'll need to prepare the
backport and send it to stable@...nel.org with a reference to the commit
in mainline.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)