netdev - Re: question about UFO behavior for bridge device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110513143627.GA29054@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Sat, 14 May 2011 00:36:27 +1000
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question about UFO behavior for bridge device

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:06:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > But, actually, i saw original big skb in eth0's tcpdump file, but not segmented skbs.
> > The behavior is right or what we want?
> > Is there anything missed about my analysis?
> 
> I assume that packet capturing is handled earlier in the transmit path.

Yes it is.  It's the same with TSO.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html