[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305645734.10756.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 08:22:14 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/6 net-next] vhost: vhost TX zero-copy support
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 08:55 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Something in your patch that overwrites the id in vhost
> and makes it put the wrong id in the used ring?
>
> By the way, need to keep in mind that a guest can
> give us the same head twice, need to make sure this
> at least does not corrupt host memory.
I think I didn't explain the problem very well here.
This patch doesn't overwrite the id. It just keeps the same coming
sequence from "head return vhost_get_vq_desc()" to pass to
vhost_add_used.
The same ids can be used many times once it passes to guest from
vhost_add_used. There is no problem. The zero copy patch doesn't have
any issue.
The problem is the order of head from return vhost_get_vq_desc should be
in sequence when it passes to vhost_add_used.
The original code has no problem, because it gets one head and pass that
head to vhost_add_used one by one once done the copy. So it's in
sequence.
This issue can easily recreate without zerocopy patch by simply changing
the order from "head return vhost_get_vq_desc" when passing to
vhost_add_used.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists