netdev - Re: [PATCH V5 2/6 net-next] netdevice.h: Add zero-copy flag in netdevice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1305738028.32080.66.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2011 10:00:28 -0700
From:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/6 net-next] netdevice.h: Add zero-copy flag in
 netdevice

On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:51 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Yes, I agree.  I think for tcpdump, we really need to copy the
> data
> > > anyway, to avoid guest changing it in between.  So we do that and
> then
> > > use the copy everywhere, release the old one. Hmm? 
> > 
> > Yes. Old one use zerocopy, new one use copy data.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Shirley
> 
> No, that's wrong, as they might become different with a
> malicious guest. As long as we copied already, lets realease
> the data and have everyone use the copy. 

Ok, I will patch pskb_expand_head to test it out.

Shirley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html