[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimsT3fPZnKXVwBRADN=xSV4R-+GWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:48:35 +0200
From: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Subject: Re: PATCH] SCTP: fix race between sctp_bind_addr_free() and sctp_bind_addr_conflict()
2011/5/18 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>:
> Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 16:36 +0200, Jacek Luczak a écrit :
>
>> ---
>> net/sctp/bind_addr.c | 10 ++++------
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/bind_addr.c b/net/sctp/bind_addr.c
>> index faf71d1..6150ac5 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/bind_addr.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/bind_addr.c
>> @@ -140,14 +140,12 @@ void sctp_bind_addr_init(struct sctp_bind_addr
>> *bp, __u16 port)
>> /* Dispose of the address list. */
>
> I am afraid your mailer mangled the patch.
>
> You should have only one line :
>
> @@ -140,14 +140,12 @@ void sctp_bind_addr_init(struct sctp_bind_addr *bp, __u16 port)
>
> Instead, there is a line wrap :
>
> @@ -140,14 +140,12 @@ void sctp_bind_addr_init(struct sctp_bind_addr
> *bp, __u16 port)
>
Sadly I'm completely aware of that. I don't have any such here that
actually would not do this. Patch is attached to email just because of
that. I can resend this in the evening from home.
-Jacek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists