[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinZOEz7Bhc+UgcWkrGb-rtCJ-kFvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:56:45 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] rps: Inspect GRE encapsulated packets to get flow hash
Eric,
Thanks for comments.
> For sure it helps if this machine is the final host for these packets.
>
I would hope it helps routers too, assuming RPS already helps non
encapsulated traffic in a router.
> If I am a firewall or router [and not looking into GRE packets], maybe I
> dont want to spread all packets received on a tunnel to several cpus and
> reorder them when forwarded.
>
Do know a specific use case where this patch would be a bad thing? I
don't believe there's any special ooo constraints on the packets in a
tunnel, flow ordering should still be maintained.
> 3) table could contains 'pointers' to decoding function, that would
> recompute a new rxhash function.
>
This could be done as a function in the protocol switch table, so that
all the protocol specific code could be moved out of dev.c. I thought
about that several times but haven't convinced myself it's worth it;
even with the code to handle tunneling the get_hash function is still
pretty elegant (I believe ipip support is just two more lines by the
way).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists