netdev - Re: 2.6.39-rc7-git11, x86/32, failed on ppp2897'th interface, PERCPU: allocation failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1305788113.3019.19.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 19 May 2011 08:55:13 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc7-git11, x86/32, failed on ppp2897'th interface,
 PERCPU:  allocation failed

Le jeudi 19 mai 2011 à 08:39 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :

> Its a known problem : When ipv6 is enabled, we allocate percpu memory to
> hold per device snmp counters.
> 
> make sure kernel idea of max possible cpus matches real number of cpus.
> 
> And yes, switching to 64bit kernel helps a lot.
> 
> 

Looking at snmp6_alloc_dev(), we allocate three mib per device :

ipstats_mib  (30 * sizeof(u64) * number_of_possible_cpus)
icmpv6_mib    (4 * sizeof(long) * number_of_possible_cpus)
icmpv6msg_mib  (26 * sizeof(long))

For sure icmp ones dont need percpu counter. Plain atomic_long_t
(shared) would be enough, since ICMP messages are rare enough.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html