lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A6A2125329CFD4D8CC40C9E8ABCAB9F250D8853B7@MILEXCH2.ds.jdsu.net>
Date:	Thu, 19 May 2011 18:48:02 -0700
From:	Jon Zhou <Jon.Zhou@...u.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: packet received in a wrong rx-queue?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:36 AM
> To: Jon Zhou
> Cc: e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: packet received in a wrong rx-queue?
> 
> From: Jon Zhou <Jon.Zhou@...u.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:22:07 -0700
> 
> > form the 82599 datasheet, the hash algorithm is consist of src/dst
> > ip, src/dst port,protocol why it got different hash value with same
> > ip/port pair?
> 
> The same reason why feeding different sets of discrete 32-bit and
> 16-bit values to a cryptographic hash results in a different final
> hash value.
> 
> Our software RPS/RFS implementation used to have this quality too.

Even that it gets different hash value, both packets should be delivered to same rx-queue,

Because they are belong to same flow?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ