[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A6A2125329CFD4D8CC40C9E8ABCAB9F250D8853B7@MILEXCH2.ds.jdsu.net>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:48:02 -0700
From: Jon Zhou <Jon.Zhou@...u.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: packet received in a wrong rx-queue?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:36 AM
> To: Jon Zhou
> Cc: e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: packet received in a wrong rx-queue?
>
> From: Jon Zhou <Jon.Zhou@...u.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:22:07 -0700
>
> > form the 82599 datasheet, the hash algorithm is consist of src/dst
> > ip, src/dst port,protocol why it got different hash value with same
> > ip/port pair?
>
> The same reason why feeding different sets of discrete 32-bit and
> 16-bit values to a cryptographic hash results in a different final
> hash value.
>
> Our software RPS/RFS implementation used to have this quality too.
Even that it gets different hash value, both packets should be delivered to same rx-queue,
Because they are belong to same flow?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists