| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4A6A2125329CFD4D8CC40C9E8ABCAB9F250D8853B7@MILEXCH2.ds.jdsu.net> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:48:02 -0700 From: Jon Zhou <Jon.Zhou@...u.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: "e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: packet received in a wrong rx-queue? > -----Original Message----- > From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net] > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:36 AM > To: Jon Zhou > Cc: e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org > Subject: Re: packet received in a wrong rx-queue? > > From: Jon Zhou <Jon.Zhou@...u.com> > Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:22:07 -0700 > > > form the 82599 datasheet, the hash algorithm is consist of src/dst > > ip, src/dst port,protocol why it got different hash value with same > > ip/port pair? > > The same reason why feeding different sets of discrete 32-bit and > 16-bit values to a cryptographic hash results in a different final > hash value. > > Our software RPS/RFS implementation used to have this quality too. Even that it gets different hash value, both packets should be delivered to same rx-queue, Because they are belong to same flow? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists