netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] bna: Add Debugfs & Generic Netlink Interfaces to BNA Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110521.233117.1332969294033493540.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 21 May 2011 23:31:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rmody@...cade.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, adapter_linux_open_src_team@...cade.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] bna: Add Debugfs & Generic Netlink Interfaces to
 BNA Driver

From: Rasesh Mody <rmody@...cade.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 16:06:27 -0700

> Can you please tell what is the state of this patch set? We are wondering if the patches are still under review.

The review feedback you received was that a whole new genetlink protocol
was overkill for the facilities you are providiing at the moment, so the
state of the patch moved to "changed requested"

I saw your response, and I simply disagree with it, so the patches
are staying in that state.

In any event, you don't need to ask me, check patchwork.  You make
patchwork absolutely pointless if you ask me what the state of the
patch is, and this makes a lot of extra unnecessary work for me.
Don't do it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html