lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 22 May 2011 14:04:04 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
	Nicolas de Peslo√ľan 
	<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	andy@...yhouse.net, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vlan: Do not support clearing VLAN_FLAG_REORDER_HDR

On 05/22/2011 12:39 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Simplify the vlan handling code by not supporing clearing of
> VLAN_FLAG_REORDER_HDR.  Which means we always make the vlan handling
> code strip the vlan header from the packets, and always insert the vlan
> header when transmitting packets.
>
> Not stripping the vlan header has alwasy been broken in combination with
> vlan hardware accelleration.  Now that we are making everything look
> like accelerated vlan handling not stripping the vlan header is always
> broken.
>
> I don't think anyone actually cares so simply stop supporting the broken
> case.

I've lost track of the VLAN code a bit.  Is there any documentation
somewhere about what happens in these various cases:

*  Open a raw packet socket on eth0.
   *  Do we get tagged VLAN packets?  (I'd expect yes.)
   *  If we sent a tagged VLAN packet, it's sent without modification?  (I'd expect yes.)
   **  Without "yes" to the two above, one cannot do user-space bridging properly.

*  Open a raw packet socket on VLAN eth0.5
   *  Do we get tagged VLAN packets?  (I'd expect no.)
   *  If we send an un-tagged packet, I expect it would be tagged?
   *  What if we sent a tagged packet with same VID?
   *  With different VID?

Many years ago we supported the REORDER, but we suggested disabling
it for most users because it was a performance drag.  Funny that now
it seems to be the opposite!

Thanks,
Ben


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists