lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 08:29:16 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> To: Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com> Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 v2] net: vlan: make non-hw-accel rx path similar to hw-accel Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:59:49AM CEST, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com wrote: <snip> > >And because some setups may still require the skb not to be untagged, >may be we need the ability to re-tag the skb in some situations... >When a protocol handler or rx_handler is explicitly registered on a >net_device which expect to receive tagged skb, we should deliver >tagged skb to it... Arguably, this may sound incredible for the >general case, but may be required for not-so-special cases like >bridge or protocol analyzer. Wait, what setups/code require the skb not to be untagged? If there's such, it should be fixed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists