[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik0NZSC84-_-j0LyyzSJykH-VxGXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 08:59:39 +0300
From: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Octavian Purdila <tavi@...pub.ro>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [v3 00/39] faster tree-based sysctl implementation
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> I will mention a couple of nits I noticed while I was skimming through
> your patches.
> - There can be multiple proc superblocks and thus multiple inodes
> referring to the same /proc/sys file, if there are multiple pid
> namespaces.
OK. I'll revert the patch that make converts an int counter into an u8
and post an update. I guess this is what you were referring to.
https://github.com/luciang/linux-2.6-new-sysctl/commit/b7a547b8ce7484ae22eea34a860f674fcb19c11b
> - I have a hope to move /proc/sys into /proc/<pid>/sys so we don't have
> to look at current to determine the namespace we want to display.
> That would allow the deeply magic sysctl_is_seen check to be removed
> from proc_sys_compare. That is not your problem, but of an
> explanation why the namespaces are passed through.
OK, I'll go an change things to pass the current namespace as it were
before my changes.
Thank you.
--
.
..: Lucian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists