lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 13:54:01 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: net: enable dynamic lro disabling for vlans

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:22:49AM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 13:15 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Hey there-
> > 	Noted recently that, while physical devices have lro disabled when
> > attached to a bridge, vlan devices do not.
> 
> Good point.
> 
> > This is because the vlan netdev has
> > no get/set flags method in its ethtool_ops struct. This series adds those
> > methods as passthrough calls to the underlying physical devices, so that whe
> > dev_disable_lro is called on a vlan device, the physical device underneath has
> > lro properly disabled.
> 
> But I don't think this is correct.
> 
> The get_flags() result should be masked with vlan_features.  And
> set_flags() shouldn't be allowed; the VLAN device should normally follow
> the parent device and not the other way round.  I think
I'm not sure thats entirely true (see vlan_ethtool_get_settings, it does a
passthrough to the physical device just like I'm doing, although you're correct
we don't do any passthrough of the set methods).

> dev_disable_lro() needs to handle VLAN devices explicitly, instead.
> 
I suppose that will work just as well as this, and likely will be more concise.
I'll respin shortly.

Best
Neil

> Ben.
> 
> -- 
> Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ