[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110524.011942.393855175233217324.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 01:19:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, greearb@...delatech.com,
nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com, jpirko@...hat.com, xiaosuo@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, jesse@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vlan: Do not support clearing VLAN_FLAG_REORDER_HDR
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:05:54 -0700
> 3) What do we do with pf_packet and vlan hardware acceleration when
> dumping not the vlan interface but the interface below the vlan
> interface?
>
> Do we provide an option to keep the vlan header? Should that option
> be on by default?
>
The vlan_tci in the V2 pf_packet auxdata was intended for this
purpose.
So no matter what variant of behavior is occurring, apps can properly
reconstitute the VLAN header if they inspect the vlan_tci in the
auxdata.
The only thing that seems to be missing is an indication that a VLAN
tag was present at all, ie. vlan_tx_tag_present(), in this manner an
application could then differentiate between no VLAN header and a VLAN
tag of zero.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists