[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110525103230.GA6057@orbit.nwl.cc>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 12:32:30 +0200
From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ne@...urth.eu, Johann Baudy <johann.baudy@...-log.net>,
Lennert Buytenhek <kernel@...tstofly.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: ARM, AF_PACKET: caching problems on Marvell Kirkwood
Hi,
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:17:53PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:46:01PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I can reproduce it on a Kirkwood:
> >
> > [ 0.000000] CPU: Feroceon 88FR131 [56251311] revision 1 (ARMv5TE), cr=00053977
>
> Thanks for the information. Seems like we have the same CPU:
>
> | [ 0.000000] CPU: Feroceon 88FR131 [56251311] revision 1 (ARMv5TE), cr=00053177
> | [ 0.000000] CPU: VIVT data cache, VIVT instruction cache
>
> and it's actually VIVT, not VIPT as I wrote in an earlier mail.
I have been looking at flush_dcache_page(), which is supposed to do the
trick when caches need to be flushed/dropped for the mmapped memory.
Interestingly, there seems to be no page mapping - so page_mapping(page)
returns NULL and therefore __flush_dcache_aliases(mapping, page) is
never being called.
Could that be the culprit here? I guess there should always be a mapping
present for mmapped pages, right?
Greetings, Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists