netdev - Re: [RFC] af-packet: Save reference to bound network device.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 May 2011 15:22:20 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] af-packet: Save reference to bound network device.

On 05/25/2011 03:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:05:10 -0700
>
>> Doesn't this piece of code take care of that?
>> I tested with rmmod..but of course I could have missed something.
>>
>> @@ -2266,6 +2284,10 @@ static int packet_notifier(struct
>> notifier_block *this, unsigned long msg, void
>>   				}
>>   				if (msg == NETDEV_UNREGISTER) {
>>   					po->ifindex = -1;
>> +					if (po->bound_dev) {
>> + dev_put(po->bound_dev);
>> +						po->bound_dev = NULL;
>> +					}
>>   					po->prot_hook.dev = NULL;
>>   				}
>>   				spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
>>
>
> Indeed, it should, thanks for pointing that out.
>
> Wait a second, why do you need to store the device a second
> time, can't you get at po->prot_hook.dev in all the necessary
> spots?

I think so...I'll poke at the code a bit and run some more
tests using that instead...

Thanks,
Ben


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html