netdev - Re: [PATCH 12/34] isdn/diva: Drop __TIME_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DDE0F5F.9080303@suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2011 10:29:19 +0200
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	Armin Schindler <armin@...ware.de>
Cc:	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/34] isdn/diva: Drop __TIME__ usage

On 26.5.2011 10:15, Armin Schindler wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011, Michal Marek wrote:
>> Dne 5.4.2011 17:10, Armin Schindler napsal(a):
>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>> The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to
>>>> repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> The module can be build separately from the kernel, therefore it can have
>>> an own build timestamp.
>>
>> So the module timestamp and kernel timestamp vary by a couple of
>> minutes. But is it really a problem?
> 
> It could be a lot more than minutes. But it isn't a problem.
> I just tried to keep the sources in sync with out-of-tree version.
> 
>> I don't think so. So is there an
>> objection against applying this patch?
> 
> No objection. Please go ahead with the patch.

OK, thanks. Applied to kbuild-2.6.git#trivial.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html