[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DDE84F2.7080706@netfilter.org>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:50:58 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 resend] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Handle Cisco 7941/7945
IP phones
Hi Eric,
On 20/05/11 06:36, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> Most SIP devices use a source port of 5060/udp on SIP requests, so the
> response automatically comes back to port 5060:
>
> phone_ip:5060 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060 100 Trying
>
> The newer Cisco IP phones, however, use a randomly chosen high source
> port for the SIP request but expect the response on port 5060:
>
> phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:5060 100 Trying
>
> Standard Linux NAT, with or without nf_nat_sip, will send the reply back
> to port 49173, not 5060:
>
> phone_ip:49173 -> proxy_ip:5060 REGISTER
> proxy_ip:5060 -> phone_ip:49173 100 Trying
>
> But the phone is not listening on 49173, so it will never see the reply.
>
> This patch modifies nf_*_sip to work around this quirk by extracting
> the SIP response port from the Via: header, iff the source IP in the
> packet header matches the source IP in the SIP request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
@Eric: could you please confirm that you ack'ed this patch? I don't find
the email with your explicit ack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists