netdev - Re: ip fragments sent in reverse order?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTimTLoJkmD77NGcdgRaayT+Uj06YpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 May 2011 08:20:02 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ip fragments sent in reverse order?

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Chris Friesen
<chris.friesen@...band.com> wrote:
>
> I read that Linux intentionally sends IP fragments in reverse order to allow
> for some optimization on the receive side.  I'm trying to find this code,
> but what I see in ip_fragment() seems to be creating/sending the fragments
> in order.  Has this changed over the years?
>

Yes. Now the fragments are sent in order.

-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html