lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 27 May 2011 08:20:02 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ip fragments sent in reverse order?

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Chris Friesen
<chris.friesen@...band.com> wrote:
>
> I read that Linux intentionally sends IP fragments in reverse order to allow
> for some optimization on the receive side.  I'm trying to find this code,
> but what I see in ip_fragment() seems to be creating/sending the fragments
> in order.  Has this changed over the years?
>

Yes. Now the fragments are sent in order.


-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ