netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/net/caif)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110527110123.aa7bbf38.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 27 May 2011 11:01:23 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sjur Braendeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/net/caif)

Hi Randy,

On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:07:02 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:194: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void
> drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:202: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void
> 
> I'm curious:  how do warnings like this get overlooked?
> too much noise in the build messages?  or it wasn't overlooked, just ignored?

For me, too much noise :-(  I catch some, but not all.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped