netdev - Re: SO_BINDTODEVICE inconsistency between IPv4 and IPv6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1306537651.2029.196.camel@i7.infradead.org>
Date:	Sat, 28 May 2011 00:07:30 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	"Yuniverg, Michael" <michael.yuniverg@...el.com>,
	"Yedvab, Nadav" <nadav.yedvab@...el.com>
Subject: Re: SO_BINDTODEVICE inconsistency between IPv4 and IPv6

On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:29 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> We've discovered strange behaviour when we listen on in6addr_any and use
> SO_BINDTODEVICE to bind to the lo device.
> 
> We can connect to any IPv4 address that is local to the machine, on any
> interface. (This is true whether we listen on AF_INET6/in6addr_any and
> accept IPv4 connections on the IPv6 socket, or whether we just listen on
> AF_INET/INADDR_ANY).
> 
> The IPv6 behaviour is different — the only IPv6 address that we can
> connect to is ::1. 

Michael, Nadav ― did you ever get any further with this?

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html