netdev - Re: [ovs-dev] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] ethtool: ETHTOOL_SFEATURES: remove NETIF_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 May 2011 10:31:03 -0700
From:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc:	Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
	dev@...nvswitch.org,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	xen-api@...ts.xensource.com,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] ethtool: ETHTOOL_SFEATURES:
 remove NETIF_F_COMPAT return

2011/5/28 Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>:
> On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 08:35 +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:25:55AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 18:34 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>> > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 04:45:50PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > > > On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 17:28 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > > >      (note: ETHTOOL_S{SG,...} are not ever going away)
>> > > > >    - causes NETIF_F_* to be an ABI
>> > > > If feature flag numbers are not stable then what is the point of
>> > > > /sys/class/net/<name>/features?  Also, I'm not aware that features have
>> > > > ever been renumbered in the past.
>> > > Since no NETIF_F_* were exported earlier, I assume /sys/class/net/*/features
>> > > is a debugging aid. What is it used for besides that?
>> > xen-api <https://github.com/xen-org/xen-api> uses it in
>> > scripts/InterfaceReconfigureVswitch.py.  Though it doesn't seem to be
>> > used for a particularly good reason...
>>
>> Look like it should use ETHTOOL_GFLAGS instead for netdev_has_vlan_accel().

ETHTOOL_GFLAGS didn't expose the vlan acceleration flags until 2.6.37,
which is why /sys/class/net was used instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html