[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306804594.7481.642.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:16:34 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, anton@...ba.org,
leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, michael@...erman.id.au,
jesse@...nel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] ehea: Remove unused tcp_end field in send WQ
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 20:12 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 23:06 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:31:13 -0700
> > > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 10:52 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > >> plain text document attachment (ehea_22.patch)
> > >> The tcp_end field is not actually used by the hardware, so there
> > >> is no need to set it.
> > >> +++ linux-net/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_qmr.h 2011-05-12 07:48:06.380382084 +1000
> > >> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ struct ehea_swqe {
> > >> u8 immediate_data_length;
> > >> u8 tcp_offset;
> > >> u8 reserved2;
> > >> - u16 tcp_end;
> > >> + u16 reserved2b;
> > >> u8 wrap_tag;
> > >> u8 descriptors; /* number of valid descriptors in WQE */
> > >> u16 reserved3;
> > > struct ehea_swqe isn't __packed. Shouldn't it be?
> > Please don't mark it __packed unless absolutely necessary :-)
>
> Isn't it read from hardware.
> If not, why reserve anything?
All the fields have the required alignment, so __packed shouldn't be
necessary but won't hurt either. Yes, it's a HW accessed structure.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists