[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:23:53 -0600
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] should we care of COMPAT mode in bridge ?
On 06/06/2011 02:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:45:40 +0200
>
>> While trying Alexander Holler patch, I found a 32bit brctl program was
>> not able to work on a 64bit kernel. So I had to switch to another
>> machine for my tests.
>>
>> brctl addbr mybridge
>> ->
>> socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3
>> ioctl(3, SIOCSIFBR, 0xffd509c0) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
>>
>> Should we care or not ?
>
> I think we should make an effort to fix this.
For current status of affairs, this makes sense.
It raises an interesting question though...do we plan on supporting
compat indefinitely?
As I see it x86 generally makes more sense to run as 64-bit when
possible due to the extra register availability. Compat is primarily
useful for the embedded space and for backwards compatibility, and
ripping it out would cause a lot of grief for legacy 32-bit apps. It
would simplify the userspace/kernel interface though.
Chris
--
Chris Friesen
Software Developer
GENBAND
chris.friesen@...band.com
www.genband.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists