[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1307355820.2765.15.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:23:40 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@...PERTEmbedded.de>
Cc: Martin Hein <MHein@...PERTEmbedded.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ethtool -E rejects magic >= 80000000
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 12:10 +0200, Jens Rottmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we tripped over the fact that commands like e.g.
>
> ethtool -E ... magic 0xCCCC8086 ...
>
> are no longer accepted with a new Debian though the same worked on an
> ancient Slackware. Current ethtool now firmly insists on a -0x80000000
> .. +0x7FFFFFFF range for "magic", so instead of the PCI ID (usually) you
> have to provide its negative two's complement:
>
> ethtool -E ... magic -0x33337F7A ...
>
> This works, but is rather nonintuitive and akward.
Indeed. I would think that the input format for the magic value on the
command line should match the output format from 'ethtool -e', except
that the magic value is never output!
> A bit of gitweb browsing led us to a commit dated 25 Jun 2010, which we
> think triggered the new behaviour:
>
> ethtool: Parse integers into variables of different sizes and byte orders
>
> The commit changed
>
> { "magic", CMDL_INT, &seeprom_magic, NULL },
> ...
> case CMDL_INT: {
> *p = get_int(argp[i],0);
>
> into
>
> { "magic", CMDL_S32, &seeprom_magic, NULL },
> ...
> case CMDL_S32: {
> s32 *p = info[idx].wanted_val;
> *p = get_int_range(argp[i], 0, -0x80000000LL, 0x7fffffff);
>
> which introduces a strict range check. The kernel sources' struct
> ethtool_eeprom defines __u32 magic, so probably ethtool's "magic" should
> be CMDL_U32 instead. (Meaning it should have been CMDL_UINT originally,
> i.e. the patch did not cause the problem, but only made it visible.)
Yes, I agree with this.
Of course, some users and scripts may now assume that this parameter is
signed. So perhaps the range should be -0x80000000 to 0xffffffff (union
of s32 and u32 ranges)? I'm not sure whether it's worth the trouble to
do this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists