[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110606.170056.193694265.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: davej@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, samuel@...tiz.org
Subject: Re: suspect locking in net/irda/iriap.c
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:40:58 -0400
> My reading of that comment suggests that the two locks aren't the same,
> so is this just missing a lockdep annotation ?
Dave, I'm going to check in the following to net-2.6 to try and
address this. Let me know how it works for you.
--------------------
irda: iriap: Use seperate lockdep class for irias_objects->hb_spinlock
The SEQ output functions grab the obj->attrib->hb_spinlock lock of
sub-objects found in the hash traversal. These locks are in a different
realm than the one used for the irias_objects hash table itself.
So put the latter into it's own lockdep class.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
net/irda/iriap.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/irda/iriap.c b/net/irda/iriap.c
index 3647753..f876eed 100644
--- a/net/irda/iriap.c
+++ b/net/irda/iriap.c
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ static inline void iriap_start_watchdog_timer(struct iriap_cb *self,
iriap_watchdog_timer_expired);
}
+static struct lock_class_key irias_objects_key;
+
/*
* Function iriap_init (void)
*
@@ -114,6 +116,9 @@ int __init iriap_init(void)
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ lockdep_set_class_and_name(&irias_objects->hb_spinlock, &irias_objects_key,
+ "irias_objects");
+
/*
* Register some default services for IrLMP
*/
--
1.7.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists