netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: dummy: allocate devices with alloc_netdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTinVNkcznN5kPpje4cptjCKfWW6s-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:30:38 +0300
From:	Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: dummy: allocate devices with alloc_netdev_id

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Please note I was not commenting your patch (it seems fine at a first
> glance), only warning people not doing "modprobe dummy numdummies=5000"
> without thinking a bit if their machine wont crash or freeze :)

Sorry for fooling you into killing your machine. :))

Later today I'll post a scheduler patch that speeds up the fork bomb too :)

Thank you for the explanation.

@David: I see [1][2] that you marked the patches as Rejected. If it's
not a script that sends all my patches to /dev/null because of the
100+ patch set I sent a while back, could you tell me why you rejected
the patches?

Something fundamentally wrong with them, optimisations that "normal
people" don't care about, etc.?

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99065/
[2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99066/
-- 
 .
..: Lucian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html