netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: emaclite: Add missing linux/interrupt.h header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:56:42 +0200
From:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: emaclite: Add missing linux/interrupt.h header

David Miller wrote:
> From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
> Date: Thu,  9 Jun 2011 10:15:33 +0200
> 
>> Log:
>> drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c: In function 'xemaclite_open':
>> drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c:961: error: implicit declaration of function 'request_irq'
>> drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c: In function 'xemaclite_close':
>> drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c:995: error: implicit declaration of function 'free_irq'
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.o] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
>> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
> 
> This is only relevant for the -next tree, you should specify that when
> submitting patches otherwise the maintainer not apply the patch where
> it actually belongs.

sorry for that. Yes, it is for -next tree.

Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html