lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110611142648.bf71b026.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Sat, 11 Jun 2011 14:26:48 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree

Hi Geert,

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:28:03 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 06:56, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > I assume that this is fallout from commit a6b7a407865a ("net: remove
> > interrupt.h inclusion from netdevice.h").
> 
> Ah, that's were the failures on m68k come from:
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4222666/
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4223000/

Yep.

> My first bisection between two successive versions of linux-next failed, but

Bisecting between successive linux-next versions is bound not to work.
Bisection really only works between a commit and one of ist ancestors.

> the second one between linus and linux-next just finished and points
> to that commit.

That is a much better bet.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ