[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110614.133200.1595212089561436266.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:32:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: vladz@...adcom.com
Cc: mchan@...adcom.com, bprakash@...adcom.com, eilong@...adcom.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dmitry@...adcom.com,
yaniv.rosner@...adcom.com, dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/24] bnx2x: New FW and support for 578xx
From: "Vlad Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:22:40 +0300
> On Tuesday 14 June 2011 18:54:02 David Miller wrote:
>> From: "Vlad Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>
>> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:32:31 +0300
>>
>> > We also send the new FW files to David Woodhouse. It's the first time we
>> > submit to the linux-firmware git so I hope we don't mess the things up:
>> > we DO NOT patch firmware/WHENCE and firmware/Makefile files in our
>> > net-next patches and we patch the WHENCE file in the linux-firmware
>> > patch. Dave, pls., confirm if it's a correct procedure.
>> >
>> > If it is, pls., note that the bnx2x driver will compile but won't work
>> > until u integrate the new FW into the kernel tree.
>>
>> David Woodhouse, what do you think we should do here?
>>
>> I'm inclined to integrate the firmware into net-next-2.6 since this
>> is the only way to keep the driver working consistently.
>>
>> Otherwise people won't be able to git bisect properly, and that sucks.
>
> Dave, as long as /lib/firmware contains all existing firmwares there should be
> no problems, isn't it?
You're saying above that the driver will compile but not work in net-next-2.6
until the FW is integrated, that's not acceptable, the tree must be fully
bisectable for people trying to track down bugs.
Which is it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists