netdev - Re: software iwarp stack update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTinwQ2AdV3EOxNcGDZdEsxfa5fhJ0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:54:32 +0200
From:	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:	Bernard Metzler <BMT@...ich.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma-owner@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: software iwarp stack update

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Bernard Metzler <BMT@...ich.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Also, the following statement in siw_main.c:
> >
> > ibdev->modify_port = NULL;
>
> I was expecting there is an ib_device->uverbs_cmd_mask
> flag which siw does not set... Unfortunately, it is not
> completely clear to me when a command mask bit is available
> and when the OFA core strictly expects a function pointer.
> Maybe there is some redundancy/inconsistency?

If other iWARP drivers (amso, cxgb3) have a modify_port method, why
doesn't the siw driver have such a method ? I see this as a blocking
issue.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html