netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] net/r8169: update the new parser for the new firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1308313364.11457.63.camel@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:22:44 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/r8169: update the new parser for the new
 firmware

On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 08:39 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> :
> > Francois Romieu :
> [...]
> > > The new firmware format should be the same. The old 
> > > r8168d-1.fw firmware proved usable when prefixed with :
> > > 
> > > 0000000: 0000 0000 3031 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000  ....01..........
> > > 0000010: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000  ................
> > > 0000020: 0000 0000 3000 0000 7501 0000 a000 0000  ....0...u.......
> > > 
> > > I realized after testing that netif_err could be abused with 
> > > non-string fw_info.version. :o/
> > > 
> > 
> > Excuse me. I don't understand what you want to express. Do you mean the
> > situation of the old paser with the new firmware for checking the firmware?
> 
> No. The code does a printk with a %s specifier on fw_info.version while there
> is no evidence that fw_info.version is 0 terminated.

I thought the idea of embedding a version here was to be able to report
in in get_drvinfo, not to print it on load.

Ben.

> > For the normal situation, the old paser would not use the new firmware.
> > And I put zero in front of the new firmware to prevent the old paser from
> > running it. That is all I do.
> 
> It is fine.
> 

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html