[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110619070238.GD1632@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:02:38 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, patches@...aro.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Jason Liu <jason.hui@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] serial/imx: add device tree support
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:19:34AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:19:12PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > It adds device tree data parsing support for imx tty/serial driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu <jason.hui@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt | 21 +++++
> > drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..7648e17
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +* Freescale i.MX Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter (UART)
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible : should be "fsl,<soc>-uart", "fsl,imx-uart"
>
> I'd make this "fsl,<soc>-uart", "fsl,imx51-uart"
>
> It's better to anchor these things on real silicon, or a real ip block
> specification rather than something pseudo-generic. Subsequent chips,
> like the imx53, should simply claim compatibility with the older
> fsl,imx51-uart.
>
> (in essence, "fsl,imx51-uart" becomes the generic string without the
> downside of having no obvious recourse when new silicon shows up that
> is an imx part, but isn't compatible with the imx51 uart.
Shouldn't that be the oldest SoC this core showed up? It might be an academic
question, but it would look a bit funny if mx27 got dt-support and would have a
imx51-uart? The first imx to have this core is the mx1. (Although there are
some cpu_is_mx1() calls used in the driver, but they are still available, or?)
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists