[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110619.162437.1293948476324391637.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: greearb@...delatech.com
Cc: romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] net: Support ethtool ops for rx of errored
frames.
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:15:56 -0700
> This would be separate from the 'features' patches that are floating
> around.
netdev->features is how you should implement your patch, please don't
create new facilities.
With netdev->features they can be validated against netdev->hw_features
which, in this case, r8169 would have this feature bit clear.
That's how all of this stuff is designed to work, the driver says what
the hardware can do and thus ethtool generically can validate attempts
to turn on features.
No new facilities are necessary at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists