[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110621.143153.1051393424299525425.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: xiaosuo@...il.com
Cc: victor@...iniac.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] packet: Add fanout support.
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:05:24 +0800
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:46 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Victor Julien <victor@...iniac.net>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:11 +0200
>>
>>> The hash based on skb->rxhash, does that result in a "flow" based
>>> distribution over the listeners? So all packets sharing a tuple
>>> being sent to the same socket?
>>
>> Yes, that's exactly right.
>
> But not for fragments, in additional.
That's a fundamental issue in the RFS code which I've proposed
solutions for.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists