[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110621.155816.1840729860084652508.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: fbl@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
agospoda@...hat.com, nhorman@...hat.com, lwoodman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add Network Sysrq Support
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:56:45 +0200
> Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com> wrote:
>> What about a whitelist of source MAC or IP addresses to accept the sysrq?
>
> This is one of the reasons why I still think that
> xt_SYSREQ would be the better solution, you get all
> kinds of filtering features for free.
>
> You could even use crazy things like '-m time' to restrict
> sysreq availability to working hours and whatnot.
Agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists