netdev - Re: Linux TCP's Robustness to Multipath Packet Reordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106211423400.17529@wel-95.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:25:20 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	Alexander Zimmermann <zimmermann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>
cc:	Dominik Kaspar <dokaspar.ietf@...il.com>,
	Carsten Wolff <carsten@...ffcarsten.de>,
	John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lennart Schulte <Lennart.Schulte@...sys.rwth-aachen.de>,
	Arnd Hannemann <arnd@...dnet.de>
Subject: Re: Linux TCP's Robustness to Multipath Packet Reordering

On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Alexander Zimmermann wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Am 27.04.2011 um 18:22 schrieb Dominik Kaspar:
> 
> > Hi Carsten,
> > 
> > Thanks for your feedback. I made some new tests with the same setup of
> > packet-based forwarding over two emulated paths (600 KB/s, 10 ms) +
> > (400 KB/s, 100 ms). In the first experiments, which showed a step-wise
> > adaptation to reordering, SACK, DSACK, and Timestamps were all
> > enabled. In the experiments, I individually disabled these three
> > mechanisms and saw the following:
> > 
> > - Disabling timestamps causes TCP to never adjust to reordering at all.
> 
> Reordering detection with DSACK is broken in Linux. We will fix that in
> a couple of weeks...
> 
> > - Disabling SACK allows TCP to adapt very rapidly ("perfect" aggregation!).
> 
> If you disable SACK, you will use the NewReno detection

Which probably has some reordering over-estimate bugs on its own... 
(but I've forgotten details of my suspicion long time ago so please don't 
ask for the them).

-- 
 i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html