[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E01C71C.5060003@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:42:36 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: fw@...len.de, fbl@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
agospoda@...hat.com, nhorman@...hat.com, lwoodman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add Network Sysrq Support
On 06/22/2011 06:35 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:26:23 -0400
>
>
>> Using the netfilter xt-SYSRQ code seems to store the entered code and
>> execute it later after the system has returned to a normal state....
>> which is much too late to be useful.
>>
> So add a feature that allows xt-SYSRQ to not queue the request
> and instead execute it immediately in softirq context.
>
> I don't see what the big deal is.
>
I'm not familiar with the netfilter code and was about to ask some other
colleagues about it ... but I think you answered my main question which
was "does netfilter do things in interrupt context?"
P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists