[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3367B80B08154D42A3B2BC708B5D41F63F188EE61F@EXMAIL.ad.emulex.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:53:35 -0700
From: <Sathya.Perla@...lex.Com>
To: <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/3] be2net: fix netdev_stats_update
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 4:02 PM
>To: Perla, Sathya
>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/3] be2net: fix netdev_stats_update
>
>Le vendredi 24 juin 2011 à 13:43 +0530, Sathya Perla a écrit :
>> netdev_stats_update() resets netdev->stats and then accumulates stats from
>> various rings. This is wrong as stats readers can sometimes catch zero
>values.
>> Use temporary variables instead for accumulating per-ring values.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@...lex.com>
>> ---
>
>
>Hmm, isnt it a patch I provided 10 days ago ?
>
>I find very strange so few people are able to properly attribute work
>today...
>
Yes, this patch is indeed based on your suggested-fix patch last week.
Sorry, are you referring to the fact that I missed a "Signed-off-by-Eric"?
If so, my bad, I'll resend this patch with that line...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists