[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309025217.2454.89.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:06:56 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sriram <srk@...com>, Vinay Hegde <vinay.hegde@...com>,
Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@...com>,
Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
Lennert Buytenhek <kernel@...tstofly.org>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Anant Gole <anantgole@...com>,
Chaithrika U S <chaithrika@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 26/72] arm: Move the ARM/ACORN drivers
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 09:59 -0700, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > More interestingly, if you have one of the 8390 clones, which
> directory
> > do you look in? And shouldn't etherh.c live along side 8390's files
> > as etherh is 8390-derived?
>
> Jeff created a drivers/net/ethernet/8390/ directory for all of those,
> which sounds sensible to me, but apparently he missed some of the
> nonobvious ones.
I was trying to keep the drivers that use the 8390 common files grouped
together.
I know that there are other instances like this (for instance drivers
derived from the lance.c driver) yet these derived drivers do not use
the common files that other lance drivers use. Because they are
derived, yet do not use the common code, should they still be grouped
together? Just a question, I am fine with the idea.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists