[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110625.170445.957364657527336185.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jj@...osbits.net
Cc: acme@...stprotocols.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net, llc: Avoid undefined behaviour in
llc_conn_ac_inc_vr_by_1()
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:11:12 +0200 (CEST)
> Introduce a sequence point (;) between two writes to llc_sk(sk)->vR in
> net/llc/llc_c_ac.c:llc_conn_ac_inc_vr_by_1() so that the order in
> which the writes happen become well defined.
>
> While the code may work fine now it may break at any time with a
> different compiler, a new version of current compiler or even just a
> different optimization level of the current compiler. Much better to
> clearly express what's intended in a way that guarantees the result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
How about fixing the macro so that it doesn't have side effects
like this?
That's much better than a 6 line (improperly formatted, BTW) comment
every time someone tried to use that macros with an lvalue that isn't
a local variable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists