netdev - RE: [RFC 26/72] arm: Move the ARM/ACORN drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2A3DCF3DA181AD40BDE86A3150B27B6B037558A181@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:40:20 +0530
From:	"Gole, Anant" <anantgole@...com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Govindarajan, Sriramakrishnan" <srk@...com>,
	"Hegde, Vinay" <vinay.hegde@...com>,
	"Chemparathy, Cyril" <cyril@...com>,
	Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
	Lennert Buytenhek <kernel@...tstofly.org>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
	Chaithrika U S <chaithrika@...com>
Subject: RE: [RFC 26/72] arm: Move the ARM/ACORN drivers

>It doesn't seem logical to group drivers that are used on ARM under
>the architecture when the hardware is not actually made by ARM Ltd.
>
>TI also produces chips with the C6x architecture, which will be
>supported
>in Linux in the future. It could well be that there is a version that
>uses the davinci ethernet mac. You also have a TI directory.
>

IMO davinci_emac driver should go under /ethernet/ti/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html