netdev - Re: [PATCH V7 2/4 net-next] skbuff: Add userspace zero-copy buffers in skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1309321734.3559.20.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:28:54 -0700
From:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	mst@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, avi@...hat.com,
	arnd@...db.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/4 net-next] skbuff: Add userspace zero-copy
 buffers in skb

I have submitted this patchset from Version 1 to Version 7 already in
the past few months.
Here is the link to the patchset:

http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2011/05/28/

I am working on V8 now.

Thanks
Shirley


On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 16:35 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:51:32 -0700
> 
> > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:54 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
> >> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:45:10 -0700
> >> 
> >> > To support skb zero-copy, a pointer is needed to add to skb share
> >> info.
> >> > Do you agree with this approach? If not, do you have any other
> >> > suggestions?
> >> 
> >> I really can't form an opinion unless I am shown the complete
> >> implementation, what this give us in return, what the impact is,
> etc. 
>  ..
> > You can see the overall CPU saved 50% w/i zero-copy.
> > 
> > The impact is every skb allocation consumed one more pointer in skb
> > share info, and a pointer check in skb release when last reference
> is
> > gone.
> > 
> > For skb clone, skb expand private head and skb copy, it still keeps
> copy
> > the buffers to kernel, so we can avoid user application, like
> tcpdump to
> > hold the user-space buffers too long.
> 
> Ok, now show me the "complete implementation".  I'm as interested in
> the code as I am in the numbers, that's why I asked for both. 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html