[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikrLzkXCjzBBOwHUQZEdnzTSZv9bA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:39:51 +0000
From: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@...escale.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sandeep Gopalpet <sandeep.kumar@...escale.com>,
Fleming Andy-AFLEMING <afleming@...escale.com>,
Gridish Shlomi-RM96313 <RM96313@...escale.com>,
Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@...escale.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...il.com>,
Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 37/72] fsl_*/gianfar*/ucc_*: Move the Freescale drivers
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Jeff Kirsher
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
> Move the Freescale driver into drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ and
> make the necessary Kconfig and Makefile changes.
I don't have an actual objection to this, but I just don't understand
why it's necessary. Is this a new trend for drivers/net, to have all
drivers grouped by manufacturer? Or is there something special about
Freescale?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists