netdev - Re: [PATCH] bridge: Forward EAPOL Kconfig option BRIDGE_PAE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110629163423.1d73b0ef@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:34:23 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Nick Carter <ncarter100@...il.com>
Cc:	David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: Forward EAPOL Kconfig option BRIDGE_PAE_FORWARD

The problem is that the damn 802.1 committees keep loading up protocols
on the same multicast address range. Trying to solve a design committee 
problem in the kernel is not going to make anybody happy.

I am happy with the simple solution of:
  no STP == Hub
  STP    == Bridge
These are both well know configurations and are blessed by standards.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html