lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:20:40 -0700
From:	"Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi" <bprakash@...adcom.com>
To:	"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Vladislav Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>,
	"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	mchan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the scsi tree

On 6/29/2011 7:33 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got conflicts in
> drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc.h and drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> between commit 2382d2364a60 ("[SCSI] bnx2fc: Bumped version to 1.0.2")
> from the scsi tree and commit 619c5cb6885b ("New 7.0 FW: bnx2x, cnic,
> bnx2i, bnx2fc") from the net tree.
>
> I used the versions from the net tree as those version numbers were newer.
>
Stephen, can you please send the conflicts? Most probably you should 
have seen the conflicts w.r.t version number in bnx2fc.h and date in 
bnx2fc_fcoe.c.  If that is the case, the versions from net tree are good.

Thanks,
Bhanu


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists