[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309882577.2271.23.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:16:17 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "Loke, Chetan" <Chetan.Loke@...scout.com>
Cc: Victor Julien <victor@...iniac.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] packet: Add fanout support.
Le mardi 05 juillet 2011 à 12:03 -0400, Loke, Chetan a écrit :
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-
> > owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Eric Dumazet
> > Sent: July 05, 2011 3:00 AM
> > To: Victor Julien
> > Cc: David Miller; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] packet: Add fanout support.
> >
> > Le mardi 05 juillet 2011 à 08:56 +0200, Victor Julien a écrit :
> >
> > > Is this still also true for IP fragments?
> > >
> >
> > This point was already raised. IP fragments have rxhash = 0, obviously,
> > since we dont have full information (source / destination ports for
> > example)
>
> Can we not do something like:
>
> a = src_ip_addr;
> b = dst_ip_addr;
>
> if (ip_is_fragment(ip_hdr(skb)))
> c = ip_hdr->id;
> else
> c = src_port | dest_port ; /* port_32 etc - Similar to what we have today */
>
> /* swap a/b etc */
> jhash3_words(a,b,c);
>
>
>
Sure, but non fragmented packets will then get a different rxhash.
Remember, goal is that _all_ packets of a given flow end in same queue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists